The Tract is written and edited by one neurologist. A library that clinicians rely on should be read by more than one pair of eyes, so we are inviting the first external reviewers, by name.
Everything here is sourced and dated. Choose the part you know best.
The FEBN bank (500 questions) and the epilepsy bank (189 questions). A reviewer takes one topic and checks the keyed answer, the explanation and the reference of each question.
The neuroanatomy game: 134 challenges and its atlas illustrations. A reviewer checks one region or one pathway for anatomical accuracy.
The decision-support tool weighs clinical features using published studies. A reviewer checks the weights against their sources. It has not been validated on patients, and it says so.
The clinical guides and the pages for patients and families, in English and Arabic. A reviewer reads one page against its listed sources.
You choose a part within your field: one topic of questions, one guide, one region of the atlas. You read it against its sources and send back anything that is wrong, out of date or unclear, with the reference that shows it. Most reviews take one to two hours.
We correct the page, record the change on the corrections page, and add your name and the date to what you reviewed.
Reviewers of clinical accuracy should hold a specialist qualification in the field: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology or intensive care. Senior trainees are welcome to review questions for clarity and difficulty.
You are named as reviewer on each page or set you check, with the date, and listed on this page with your institution and ORCID. The first ten are listed as founding reviewers.
There is no payment: The Tract receives no funding, carries no advertising and charges readers nothing. We ask every reviewer to declare any conflict of interest, as set out in the editorial policies.
Offer to review